RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination efforts, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in vaccinated individuals ("breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections") have emerged. Our understanding of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections continues to evolve, and there is a paucity of information describing severe breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections. We conducted this study with the aim of describing breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections requiring hospitalization and exploring factors associated with severe breakthrough infection. METHODS: The study included patients within our health network who received at least one dose of a messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine and required hospitalization due to breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection from January 1 to August 15, 2021. We performed a descriptive analysis of vaccinated patients requiring hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression (LR) analysis was performed to explore factors associated with severe breakthrough infection. RESULTS: Out of 67,223 vaccinated individuals, 78 (0.12%) patients were hospitalized with breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection, of which 25 individuals (0.04% of those vaccinated, and 32% of all hospitalized) developed severe infection. The mean age of those with breakthrough infection was 72 years, the majority were White (60%), and dyspnea was the most common reason for hospital admission (53%), with bimodal peaks of hospitalization in January-February (40%) and July-August (34%). In LR analysis, male patients had 4.03 times the odds of developing severe SARS-CoV-2 infection than female patients (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 4.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.21 - 13.40), and an immunocompromising condition had 6.32 times the odds of developing severe COVID-19 disease (aOR: 6.32, 95% CI: 1.48 - 26.18). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of severe breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection was very low, and male sex and immunocompromising conditions were associated with severe breakthrough infection. Clinicians and health systems should continue to campaign for COVID-19 vaccination aggressively.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Post-intubation cardiac arrest (PICA) is an uncommon complication of intubation, but numbers have risen to over 1.5 times the usual number since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Due to expert recommendations, high-dose rocuronium (HDR) has become a commonly used pre-intubation neuromuscular blocking agent. AIM: We conducted this retrospective case-control observational study with the hypothesis that high-dose rocuronium was not associated with higher incidence of PICA. METHODS: We included 93 patients who were intubated using the rapid sequence intubation (RSI) technique with rocuronium for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia, admitted from March 2020 to February 2021 to a tertiary care hospital in North Carolina, USA. The patients were grouped based on high (1.5 mg/kg of ideal body weight and above) versus low (<1.5 mg/kg of ideal body weight) dose rocuronium used for RSI. The differences of the various outcomes between the groups were analyzed. RESULTS: The baseline demographics were similar in both groups except for higher body mass index in high-dose group 39 versus 32 (kg/m2), p = 0.009. There was a total of six PICA events (6.45%). The HDR group had 8.0% of PICA versus 4.7% in the low-dose group. In-hospital mortality was 60.0% in the HDR group versus 72.1% in the low-dose group. CONCLUSION: The incidence of PICA in COVID-19 patients with ARDS who were intubated using the RSI technique was higher than in the pre-COVID-19 era. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: The use of high-dose paralytics during invasive ventilation with RSI and their consequences should be explored with the help of large-scale studies. The rate of PICA is still very low, and perhaps, the use of HDR is safe, as suggested by the expert panel.
RESUMO
Cerebrovascular accident is the fifth leading cause of death in the United States, with about 795,000 cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) each year. Several risk calculators for the development of stroke have been developed throughout the years, but none included iron deficiency anemia (IDA). We therefore would like to highlight the case of a 34-year-old female with severe iron deficiency anemia secondary to menorrhagia who had an ischemic stroke. An extensive workup was done and was negative. Given its significant presence with other comorbidities and various proposed pathogenesis, we propose that iron deficiency anemia be considered as a stroke factor. Studies in optimal hemoglobin or iron levels in patients with stroke to lower comorbidities and predict prognosis may also be beneficial.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients presenting with severe sepsis or septic shock remained controversial due to the paucity of data. METHODS: The retrospective case-control study included 671 adult patients who presented to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital from January 01, 2017 to December 31, 2019 with severe sepsis or septic shock. Patients were categorized into the CHF group and the non-CHF group. The primary outcome was to evaluate the compliance with ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus within 6 hours of presentation. The comparison of baseline characteristics and secondary outcomes were done between the groups who received ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus. For the subgroup analysis of the CHF group, it was divided based on if they received ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus or not, and comparison was done for baseline characteristics and secondary outcomes. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to explore the differences between the groups for in-hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: The use of ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus was low in both the CHF and non-CHF groups [39% vs. 66% (p<0.05)]. Mortality was higher in the CHF group [33% vs 18% (p<0.05)]. Multivariable analysis revealed that the use of ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus decreased the chances of mortality by 12% [OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.95 (p<0.05)]. The use of ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus did not increase the odds of mechanical ventilation [OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93-1.05 (p = 0.78)]. In subgroup analysis, the use of ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus decreased the chances of mortality by 5% [OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-0.99, (p<0.05)] and did not increase the odds of mechanical ventilation. The presence of the low ejection fraction did not influence the chance of getting fluid bolus. CONCLUSION: The use of ≥30 mL/Kg fluid bolus seems to confer protection against in-hospital mortality and is not associated with increased chances of mechanical ventilation in heart failure patients presenting with severe sepsis or septic shock.
